11/DEC/13

Winter!: Prepare for holiday gaming!


Forums top   gamerDNA.com Forums > Gaming > FPS Connections


Post Reply
Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 12-28-2008, 11:06 PM
kid8's Avatar
kid8 kid8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
kid8 has much to be proud of
cool mate
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-09-2009, 08:49 AM
Corpsecrank's Avatar
Corpsecrank Corpsecrank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
Corpsecrank has set foot on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by amurphy View Post
I think COD5 was a step backward. WW2 as a scenario is quite played out even if you do change to the less traversed pacific front. COD4 was the only one I have purchased since the first and it looks to be the last that I will purchase. WW2 is just so overused!
I disagree. With world at war the entire game felt like I was watching the history channel. They used the modern warfare engine and made improvments to create a WWII game that is as realistic as possible at this time. The entire game really breathes new life into the older WWII theme.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-22-2009, 08:02 AM
MissBunny's Avatar
MissBunny MissBunny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
MissBunny has much to be proud of
And COD WAW has tanks. You've gotta love tanks. We havent seen them in the COD series since the United Offensive expansion.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-22-2009, 10:47 AM
Crimmastermind's Avatar
Crimmastermind Crimmastermind is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 4
Crimmastermind has much to be proud of
Meh, Cod 5 is basically CoD 4 in a different setting. Apart from maps, guns (eg, setting), CoD 5 basically has nothing new or really anything that Cod 4 was lacking. In fact, by going back to WW2 it was a big step backward, because Cod4 was awesome in that it was original. Modern Warfare 2 probably won't be as good, because its still just Russians like Cod 4. Maybe they'll start a series of Modern Warfares all of which you fight the Russians. WW2 is well played out, and going back there doesn't really help the franchise.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-02-2009, 08:42 PM
Venom1983PRO's Avatar
Venom1983PRO Venom1983PRO is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 8
Venom1983PRO has set foot on a distinguished road
If treyarch/MS could sort out the multi player and the amount of problems joining games then it would be great as that is the best bit - the multi player!
In MW I found myself actually likeing the main character and hoping he would survive and have a hollywood ending but WaW I was so unmoved by the game play I almost couldn't be bothered with it!
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-05-2009, 08:53 AM
RoGVenomRV's Avatar
RoGVenomRV RoGVenomRV is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 6
RoGVenomRV has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to RoGVenomRV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Venom1983PRO View Post
If treyarch/MS could sort out the multi player and the amount of problems joining games then it would be great as that is the best bit - the multi player!
In MW I found myself actually likeing the main character and hoping he would survive and have a hollywood ending but WaW I was so unmoved by the game play I almost couldn't be bothered with it!
I believe one of the last title updates fixed the joining game, while in a party issue. Just because it uses the same engine as cod4 doesn't mean it's call of duty 4 or anything alike.

You have to look at the actual game, not compare it to another.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-05-2009, 07:54 PM
D1LDOBAGG1NS's Avatar
D1LDOBAGG1NS D1LDOBAGG1NS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Nantucket, MA
Posts: 15
D1LDOBAGG1NS has set foot on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to D1LDOBAGG1NS Send a message via Yahoo to D1LDOBAGG1NS Send a message via Skype™ to D1LDOBAGG1NS
Nope, and as I've noticed nearly all of the Newer COD games have server issues when it comes to the consoles. .
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-09-2009, 05:23 PM
Clone1138's Avatar
Clone1138 Clone1138 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5
Clone1138 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dem View Post
My thoughts exactly. I think the game is boring as hell as well. I thought I already made a post about it, maybe it was on a different board... But anyway... I keep reading how TENSE and EXCITING this game is... IGN gave it a 9,2... I think that pretty much gets rid of any doubt anybody could still have about how shit IGN is...

The game is EXACTLY the same as 4... But in the setting of 3... It's more like 3.5 than 4.5 Or maybe an mod for 4... It's booooooooooring, and just plain uninteresting.

It's 5 steps backwards, into a ravine, into a shallow river of shit.
Here here. Absolute shit. Treyarch was given gold an pissed out vinegar. A truly uninspiring game. Horrible spawning in multiplayer plus the use of optics that hardly existed in WWII. I've been playing FPS WWII games since Medal of Honor on Playstation and I have to say I'd rather play through that singleplayer over again than drudge through WAW.
__________________
That's no moon.
Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off